Test result Size (1/18) Slope offering (2/18) Lifts/cable cars (3/18) Snow reliability (4/18) Slope preparation (5/18) Access, parking (6/18) Orientation (7/18) Cleanliness (8/18) Eco-friendliness (9/18) Friendliness (10/18) Gastronomy (11/18) Après-ski (12/18) Accommodation (13/18) Families & children (14/18) Beginners (15/18) Experts, freeriders (16/18) Snow park (17/18) Cross-country (18/18) Summary
Evaluated by Skiresort.info , the world's largest test portal for ski resorts. The evaluation is done as follows
Gastronomy (ski huts, restaurants, eating at the ski resort) Gschwandtkopf – Seefeld The Gschwandtkopf ski area offers a good mix of alpine huts and restaurants.
4 mountain restaurants & ski huts
Gastronomy tip Sportalm At the Gschwandtkopf valley station
The Sportalm impresses with Tyrolean delicacies, served in the rustic, Tyrolean-style rooms or on the sun terrace.
Go to Website
Sir Henry Brasserie At the mountain station of the 4-seater chairlift Gschwandtkopf
The luxury hotel Sir Henry offers a brasserie in a casual style for skiers during the day. In the evening, fine dining is celebrated in an upscale setting.
Mountain hut tip Sonnenalm Just below the summit of the Gschwandtkopf
The rustic Sonnenalm offers Tyrolean delicacies. Sunseekers can enjoy a large terrace, and when it snows, the open fireplace in the cozy lounge provides warmth.
9 strengths of this ski resort
Feedback for the Skiresort.info Team? Please use this form
Please wait and do not close window. File will be transmitted.
Test result Size (1/18) Slope offering (2/18) Lifts/cable cars (3/18) Snow reliability (4/18) Slope preparation (5/18) Access, parking (6/18) Orientation (7/18) Cleanliness (8/18) Eco-friendliness (9/18) Friendliness (10/18) Gastronomy (11/18) Après-ski (12/18) Accommodation (13/18) Families & children (14/18) Beginners (15/18) Experts, freeriders (16/18) Snow park (17/18) Cross-country (18/18) Summary
Select specific criteria
Top evaluation criteria
Further evaluation criteria
Mountain restaurants, ski huts, gastronomy Evaluation criteria for special interests